SEO Agents
Point it at your site and get a prioritized list of the internal links you should add.
Enter your website's URL and the agent reads your pages, maps how they connect, and finds the gaps: important pages nothing links to, related articles that never reference each other, and anchors that say 'click here' instead of something useful. You get specific recommendations — source page, target page, anchor text, placement — ready to apply.
Try an example
Internal links are how a site's pages vouch for each other. They route visitors to related content, spread authority from strong pages to important ones, and tell search engines which pages matter and what they're about. Most sites build them haphazardly — a nav menu, a footer, whatever the author remembered to add — and leave their best pages stranded.
The Internal Linking Agent is for site owners who suspect their structure is leaking value, SEOs who know link architecture matters but lack the hours to audit it by hand, and content teams whose archive has grown faster than their linking discipline. If your site has more than a few dozen pages, there are almost certainly links it should have and doesn't.
The input is a URL. The agent reads your pages, maps the existing link structure, and analyzes the relationships between them: which pages cover related topics, which important pages receive few or no links, which anchors describe their destination and which waste the opportunity. The output is a prioritized recommendation list — add this link, on this page, pointing here, with this anchor, in this section.
A crawler can tell you a page has zero inbound links. This agent tells you which pages should link to it and why — the contextual judgment that turns a finding into a fix. Recommendations come with reasoning, so you're approving a strategy rather than trusting a count.
If your site runs on Dual7, applying the recommendations is direct: edit the page, add the link in context, publish to your domain. If it doesn't, the output works as a fix list for any CMS. Either way, you review every suggestion before it ships — link architecture is judgment, and the final call stays with you.
Pages with no internal links pointing to them are identified, along with the specific pages that should link to them.
Recommendations come from topical relationships between pages, not just keyword matches — links a reader would actually follow.
Suggested anchors name the destination's topic instead of 'read more', giving visitors and search engines a real signal.
Fixes are ranked — money pages with few links first — so an afternoon of work lands where it matters.
Each recommendation notes where on the source page the link fits, because a link in relevant body copy outperforms one dumped in a list.
The agent identifies your strongest pages and suggests where their links would do the most good downstream.
Output is a set of concrete edits you can apply in an afternoon, not a dashboard of metrics that still needs interpretation.
Point the agent at your website — the whole site or the section you care about.
It reads your content and existing links, building a picture of how pages relate and connect today.
See orphan pages, missed contextual links and weak anchors, ranked by likely impact, each with reasoning attached.
Edit pages in Dual7 or your CMS, adding links in context — then re-run the audit when your content grows.
The agent reads your pages and existing links to build a map of your architecture — what's connected, what's isolated, and where the authority flows today.
Pages with no internal links are flagged with the specific source pages that should reference them, turning a known problem into a short task list.
Recommendations are based on what pages are about — articles covering adjacent subtopics, services related to guides — so suggested links make sense to a reader, not just a crawler.
Each suggested link comes with descriptive anchor text options that name the destination's topic naturally within the surrounding sentence.
Existing links with generic anchors — 'click here', 'this page' — are surfaced with better alternatives, an easy win on pages you already have.
The agent identifies your pillar and money pages, then finds supporting content that should link to them but doesn't — the classic gap in growing sites.
Source page, target page, anchor text and placement for each suggested link, ranked by importance.
Pages receiving no internal links, with the pages that should link to them.
Existing generic anchors paired with descriptive replacements.
Important pages and the supporting content that should be linking to them.
Why each link is suggested — the topical relationship or structural gap it addresses.
Example output
Input: the marketing site's URL. Output: three orphan pages found (an integration guide, two case studies), five high-value pages with thin inbound links, and twelve specific recommendations — including linking the onboarding article to the integrations page with the anchor 'connecting your existing tools', and replacing four 'learn more' anchors with descriptive text. Each fix notes the section of the source page where it belongs.
An SEO runs the audit quarterly, catching new posts that went live with no inbound links before they sit unnoticed for months.
A business owner discovers that their best case study has zero links to it and gets three specific places to add them.
An editor verifies that every supporting article in a hub links up to the pillar — and gets the missing connections listed.
A merchandiser connects buying guides to the category pages they support, with anchors that read naturally in the guide's copy.
An agency turns a client's vague 'improve internal linking' request into a prioritized, reasoned fix list the client's team can apply.
An editorial team surfaces evergreen articles that newer content should reference, keeping the archive working instead of buried.
A marketer audits current links before changing URLs, so the new structure preserves the connections that already work.
Software sites connect feature pages, integration docs and blog content into a structure that routes readers toward the product.
Large archives stay discoverable as new articles link back to evergreen pieces instead of letting them sink.
Guides, categories and products link in ways that help shoppers — and search engines — move from research to purchase.
Firms connect educational content to the service pages it supports, so expertise demonstrably leads somewhere.
Clinic sites link condition explainers to treatment pages, matching how patients actually research.
Teams audit and fix link architecture across client sites with reasoned recommendations instead of raw crawl exports.
You provide
https://our-saas-site.com — we publish weekly but never link strategically
The agent
The agent maps 60 pages, identifies the pricing and features pages as underlinked hubs, and finds blog posts covering adjacent topics that never reference them.
You get
Eighteen recommendations: posts-to-feature links with in-context anchors, three orphan pages with suggested source pages, and six generic anchors to replace — ranked so the pricing-page fixes come first.
You provide
Audit internal links across our law firm's practice areas and blog
The agent
The agent maps practice-area pages and the article archive, checking whether educational content routes readers to the relevant service.
You get
A fix list connecting each practice area to its supporting articles and vice versa, with descriptive anchors like 'contested divorce process' replacing 'our services page'.
You provide
https://my-store.example.com — link our buying guides to categories
The agent
The agent pairs each guide with the category pages it discusses and finds the sections where a link fits the surrounding copy.
You get
Per-guide recommendations: which categories to link, with what anchors, in which paragraph — plus category pages linking back to guides for shoppers still researching.
You provide
We're migrating platforms and changing URLs — what links do we need to preserve?
The agent
The agent inventories existing internal links so the new structure can maintain the relationships that currently carry weight.
You get
A map of current link relationships by importance, flagging the connections the migration must preserve and the ones it could improve while everything is being touched anyway.
You provide
Find orphan pages on our nonprofit's site
The agent
The agent crawls the site and identifies pages unreachable by any internal link, then matches each to logical source pages.
You get
Five orphan pages — including the volunteer application — each with two or three specific pages that should link to them and suggested anchor text.
| Aspect | With the agent | Manual process |
|---|---|---|
| Finding the gaps | Site mapped automatically from a URL | Spreadsheet, crawler export, and hours of cross-referencing |
| Recommendation quality | Contextual suggestions based on topical relationships | Limited to whatever overlaps the auditor happens to spot |
| Anchor text | Descriptive anchors drafted per recommendation | Written on the fly, often defaulting to 'read more' |
| Prioritization | Fixes ranked by page importance and gap severity | Everything looks equally urgent in a raw export |
| Placement guidance | Section-level notes on where each link fits | Left to whoever makes the edit |
| Repeatability | Re-run the audit as content grows | A manual audit is a project nobody schedules twice |
| Output format | A concrete fix list with reasoning | A crawl report that still needs interpretation |
A chatbot can discuss linking theory but can't see your pages. The agent maps your real structure and recommends against what's actually there.
Every page is analyzed against every other page with the same logic — no context window dropping your older content from consideration.
The output is 'add this link here with this anchor', not a tutorial on internal linking you still have to execute alone.
On Dual7, the recommended edits happen on real pages you publish to your domain — the audit and the fix share a workspace.
A page nothing links to is nearly invisible to visitors and search engines alike. If it deserves to exist, connect it; if it doesn't, consider removing it.
The best internal links answer the question a reader has at that moment in the text. Placement in relevant body copy beats any sidebar or footer list.
'Our guide to payroll deadlines' tells everyone — visitors and crawlers — what's on the other end. 'Click here' tells no one anything.
Articles and guides should route readers toward the pages that convert. If a post relates to a service, the link belongs in the post.
A paragraph stuffed with links helps no one. Add the two or three that genuinely serve the reader and skip the rest.
Every new page is both a link opportunity and a potential orphan. Running the audit after publishing bursts keeps the structure current.
The agent reasons about topics, but you know your business priorities. Approve links that serve your readers and skip the ones that don't fit.
It analyzes how the pages on your site link to each other and finds what's missing: pages with no inbound links, related content that never cross-references, and anchors that waste their descriptive opportunity. This agent goes beyond detection and recommends specific fixes — source, target, anchor and placement.
They help search engines discover your pages, understand what each page is about through anchor text, and judge which pages you consider important. They also route real visitors to related content. No tool can promise ranking changes, but a coherent link structure removes obstacles that hold pages back.
A page with no internal links pointing to it. Visitors can't find it by browsing, and search engines treat it as unimportant. The agent identifies orphan pages and — more usefully — names the specific pages that should link to them.
By analyzing what your pages are about. Pages covering related topics, articles that support a service, guides that discuss a category — these relationships justify links a reader would actually follow. Suggestions come with the reasoning, so you can judge each one.
Anchor text that describes the destination: 'our returns policy' rather than 'click here'. Descriptive anchors tell readers what to expect and tell search engines what the target page covers. The agent drafts anchor options for every recommendation.
There's no magic number. Link where it serves the reader — typically a handful of contextual links in body copy, plus navigation. More is not better; a page crammed with links dilutes each one and reads poorly.
Recommendations are delivered for your review, and on Dual7 you apply them by editing the pages directly — the workspace makes that fast. Deliberately, nothing is changed without your approval: link architecture is judgment, and automated mass-linking is how sites end up with irrelevant links everywhere.
After any significant publishing burst, site restructure, or URL change — and periodically as the archive grows. Quarterly works for actively published sites. The agent makes re-running the audit cheap enough that you don't need to ration it.
Yes. The agent reads your public pages from the URL regardless of platform, and the fix list works with any CMS. If your site runs on Dual7, applying the edits is more direct, since pages are code you own and can publish to your domain.
Orphan pages that matter to the business, then missing links pointing at your highest-value pages — services, pricing, key categories. The recommendations arrive ranked in roughly that order, with reasoning so you can reprioritize.
No — it decays as you publish. Every new page needs links to it and from it, and old pages accumulate missed connections. Treat it as maintenance: quick, regular audits rather than a rescue project every two years.
Dual7 Agents
Point it at your site and get a prioritized list of the internal links you should add. Start with your own input — the output is an editable project you own.
500+ users in production · Kanan.co moved off Salesforce onto Dual7 in four months · 100% code owned
Dual7 · a product of AlgorithmShift · Build once. Own forever.